The Ruger GP100 Match Champion was conceived by several members of our team that wanted a competition-worthy revolver." My second gun purchase was a 6" stainless GP100 and love it.
© 2020 GAMESPOT, A RED VENTURES COMPANY. The L frame beats the K frame models if you want to shoot a steady load or they did when S&W made more revolvers than pistols. Wow thanks for all the great tips. The hammer and trigger springs are seperate and can be lightened without effecting one another. Shot both and am often a rugar whore but the 686+ 6" is my dream wheelgun. They have both of them in addition to the 4.2" SP101 for rent where we shoot. I like the single action of the GP a bit more, but the double of the smith is better IMHO. Pre-lock 686's to be exact. The Smith has a better trigger, and it isn't really close. Shoot a revolver for the first time (video of it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOmcLlUFA_Q). Much better trigger, fit and finish was better and it holds an extra round. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. I tried both before purchasing and bought the 686. I had Greg Derr do a trigger job and it was $85 if I recall. Thread Tools. I am on a budget and can afford a SW 686 or a Ruger GP100. Plus, it'seems pretty bad ass to buy hot 357 Magnums that say "do not shoot in anything but Ruger revolvers" on the box. PS: Carry too? Then reassemble and you're good to go. The stock 686 has a clear advantage over the GP100 here: out of the box, the trigger of the 686 is smoother, with noticeably less stacking and a cleaner break in double-action and a precise, short single-action pull. Traded off my 686 4" sometime back. Many people like to say that if you're comparing the two you should buy a GP100 used and a 686 new. Discuss firearms, politics, 2nd amendment news. .357 revolvers require no mod or special equipment to fire .38 special, that's correct. The .357 will kick harder (you can also go in-between, with .38 Special +P). The Ruger has fairly uncomplicated internals, and as was said below, its trigger can be significantly smoothed with an hour and a half of time and $5 of sandpaper. They are all great revolvers. The only thing that remains the same between the two versions is the plot and battle maps. I'm in the market for a solid revolver and I've been bouncing between these two for quite some time. CA Central Coast The GP100 was made to compete against the then-new S&W 686/586 models. The 6" GP-100 looks bulkier, but only weighs 2 oz more than the 6-shot 686 (46 vs 44 oz). I've owned several 586/686's and always liked the way they shot. Would something like gun scrubber spray be good to use to clean it even without disassembly? Tried all three and went the S&W route. I’ve narrowed it down to two options. I've got a Security Six that I love. Someone mentioned the Smith 69, a five shot revolver, another EXCELENT choice. I've been looking for a general purpose revolver (thread here) and had a chance to rent a standard GP-100 and a 686+ yesterday, GP-100 vs 686+ - what I learned Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present I've got the 4 1/2" barrel and shooting at 25yards is easy peezy. In der Handhabung gab es leichte Unterschiede aber ich bin mit beiden zurechtgekommen. 4.2 inch barrel, 40 ounces, 9.5 inches long, MSRP $899. The only revolver I ever shot was a 686, and fuck me was it nice. Hi, I am getting a 357 revolver very soon. It's just and average condition, somewhat worn pistol. Smith double breaks sooner which is nice. If you get a 686, don't disassemble it at all, there is no need to, and the chances of damaging something are considerable. Am I correct? The Ruger launched four Blazer rounds into three-quarters of an inch before we (rather annoyingly) got spooked by the success and sent the last two an inch left. It won't fix every fault in the trigger but it will make it noticeably smoother. Rather we are trying to make a case for 8 rounds of 357 vs. 6 rounds of 41/44 Magnum in a wilderness situation. Thread Tools. We value freedom of speech as much as we do the right to keep and bear arms. Gestern war ich in einem Schiesskeller wo ich eine S&W 686 und eine Ruger KGP 161 schiessen konnte. Your choice of a .357 revolver is a good one - these are amazing handguns.
Gun violence in Maine. The 686 won. With the 686 i'll have a thinner frame along with the unsightly interior lock, however i'm a huge fan of smiths and the quality of their firearms. If seven shots of from the newest GP100 isn’t enough or if you simply want the biggest Ruger revolver in .357 Magnum, then you might find their Redhawk line of revolvers in .357 Magnum more appealing. I would suggest you try the SP101 before you commit. I've had both and just like the "feel" of the 686 better. If you get a blued GP100 I'd avoid using brake cleaner on it, there's a chance it can start to rust before you have the opportunity to relubricate it. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? Don't flick it open or slam it closed, that can damage the mechanism. I would love to hear opinions from anybody with experience in both guns. between the Ruger GP100 and and S&W; 686 revolver (both chambered in .357 mag), which is the better deal? I had the same dilemma that was solved when I got a great deal on a lnib gp100. Well on my part as far as GP100 vs. 686 I bought a GP100 and at the same time bought a S&W 686 Competitor ( Performance center 686). Now, letâ s look at some examples of SMART goals for managers. 7 shots will do. Appreciate all the responses here, I'm going to go with the Ruger. I've shot well over 1000 rounds through mine and never had an issue. Another vote for GP100. Thanks for the reply. Were Smith triggers better in the past, All the guns I’m talking about are new? How are each of them on trigger pull,accuracy, ruggedness,and value. Anyone have experience with both of these that could lend an opinion ? 686 was the first .357 I shot and I liked it a lot, but I don't like the internal lock they have now. In order to meet the daily demands of physical training, the Trainee Operations Staff suggest at a minimum each trainee should be able to complete the following upon entry into the Police Training Academy: Although trainees are only required to run a mile and half on the test, this in no way should suggest that is the longest distance we will run as a group. . Fluted means the barrel (such as the Green Mountain you speak of and others) has longitudinal (i.e. I'm too lazy to Google it at the moment, but as I recall the case diameters are identical, and the difference in .357 and .38 has something to do with what part of the bullet was measured to come up with the caliber. And yes, the front sight is easily swapped on the Ruger. I’ve shot the GP100, but I have not shot the Smith & Wesson. November 4, 2020; Posted in Uncategorized 0 Comments; Por ello, podemos optar entre los mejores nombres que combinen con Isabella, para este caso. In general, a stainless GP100 6-shot costs $829 while a stainless GP100 7-shot costs $899 ($50 more expensive than its Smith & Wesson counterpart, the 686 PLUS). Press J to jump to the feed. That being said, I keep finding myself wishing I'd gone with the Ruger instead. The new barrel has flat sides, and the underlug stretches just a bit more than halfway instead of going all the way to the muzzle. The one thing to keep in mind with revolvers is to open and close the cylinder with some care, like you'd open and close a heavy door. I never liked the GP100, but its predecessor, the Security Six, is a bombproof gun if you can find one for sale. The 686 is really $$$$$ and the GP100 will also last a lifetime like the S&W, but for less $$$. If you want to work on the GP 100 trigger and replace the factory grips, you can turn a great revolver into an outstanding one. I have owned an 2.5" SP101 and 2.5" 686. The SP101 is great if you're thinking of carrying, and I like the GP100 too (although I own a Speed Six) but I'd say 686 over it. Hose it down with brake cleaner, let it dry, and reassemble it without any lubrication, and then dry-fire it 1000 times. MORE: Dragon Ball Z: Kakarot Skipping Golden Frieza Would Be A Mistake. I certainly don't mind working on the trigger and changing the grips was already on the list. Different but close. I'm looking at either a 5" Ruger GP100 or a 5" S&W 686+ pro. there is no wrong answer – gp100 vs 686 The bottom line with these two revolvers is that they are similar to the point of absurdity. If you get a blued GP100 I'd avoid using brake cleaner on it, there's a chance it can start to rust before you have the opportunity to relubricate it. Smith & Wesson 150853 686 Plus Magnum Single/Double Action .357. Both will likely, if you take care of them, be something you can pass along to heirs, so long as the laws are copacetic. I have owned both, but now only own 2 GP100's. Is this right? Either choice is good and both weapons are just beautiful. I've narrowed it down to the 686 vs GP100. It's not entirely unfounded. They lend themselves well to dry fire, and dry fire is the great secret to good shooting. Do the responsible thing; buy one of each. So I am thinking a 2.5 " GP100 would be the way to go to have something similar in frame size to the S&W 686 snub nose. The Ruger GP100 may be one of the smoothest shooting revolvers on this list. I've taken it apart a few times, it's not bad. GP100 vs SP101 Discussion in 'General Firearms Forum' started by China boy, Apr 18, 2015. Can you carry or possess a firearm on hotel property in Maine? GP100 if you want a 6 gun you can shoot the hell out of and not worry about. Any input is appreciated. Aber es hat sich gelohnt!! It's been a long time since I shot 38 special, how's the recoil on it compared to a 9mm, 40 on semi autos? But the GP100 is a fine revolver and built like a tank. As others have said the 686 and GP100 are mid sized frames while the SP101 is a small frame. I blasted several boxes of .38 special rounds but regrettably didn't shoot any .357 through it. I'm looking at either a 5" Ruger GP100 or a 5" S&W 686+ pro. Older 686 if you want something a little more refined and have to take care of a bit more. The Ruger GP100 Match Champion's barrel is a departure from the usual GP100 barrel. I don't have any Smiths so I can't compare the two, but I'm extremely happy with my GP100. Something more closely comparable to the 686 is the Ruger GP100. I don't think the dude that it belonged to did any work on it, as a matter of fact he said he obtained it in the 80's or 90's, it was old is the point but it still worked like a charm. It is a Chevy vs Ford debate indeed. The K/L frame is pretty fat to conceal carry and … I prefer S&W revolvers over Ruger personally, but I've heard good things about the GP100. It was the first revolver I ever fired. Been looking for a 2.5" S&W 686, but after having looked at over 20 of them locally, they all either had a canted barrel or significant scuffs/scratches in the finish. There are areas like the hammer and top strap on the GP100 that show where Ruger saves a few pennies to deliver a less expensive gun. I have both, GP100 6" and 686 plus in 3". If you're buying new, I'd get a GP100. 4 auto are stellar performers, while the venerable Also if I understand correctly they don't require any moon clips to fire the 38 special correct? This will make your hands ache but it does not take as long as you might think. Hi, I am getting a 357 revolver very soon. I prefer the GP grip but that's an easy swap. While not a monumental effort in any way other than gameplay, Ogre Battle: Limited Edition's … If you get a 686, don't disassemble it at all, there is no need to, and the chances of damaging something are considerable. More specific than /r/guns but more broad than ccw etc. 3 Reasons Why a Ruger GP100 IS Stronger than a Smith & Wesson 686? along the length of the barrel) dished out areas on the sides, much like many revolver cylinders are fluted. No real reason that I can remember, just wanted something different. Love my 3 inch .44 mag... lots of love going down range in a hurry! I second the one of each school... plus a Colt Python and then a Dan Wesson... just to have a choice on Range Day. They can still be had for fairly cheap if you look hard enough, and they'll last forever. I'm not very good, but that was the best i've ever shot with a handgun. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. I guess my wallet can blame all the nice people in this thread. You will just have to finger each and see which one feels best in your hand as they are BOTH world class guns. Mine are for home defense, range, and just personal enjoyment. I personally prefer the trigger and the looks of Smith and Wesson revolvers. The gp100 seems very solid, however I've heard rumors of timing issues and some rough machining from the factory, although it should be superior for handling hot loads if I choose to take that route. Both will likely be fine, though the Ruger is simpler, more overbuilt, and a bit less refined. And yea I'll definitely go for the stainless steel. I’m in the market for a .357 revolver (6 inch barrel). Since then there have been numerous attempts to do the same with GP-100 vs 686.